The author behind hit children's TV show Charlie And Lola has revealed that her character caused anxiety at the BBC - with a forward roll.
Lauren Child has sold millions of copies of her books about Charlie and his younger sister, Lola, and the stories have been adapted for the small screen.
But the illustrator and writer said that when it came to making the animated TV series, the corporation was concerned about the potential for injury when Lola performed a forward roll.
"We almost had a problem with Lola doing forward rolls," she said. "The BBC got terribly worried she could have a dreadful accident and break her neck.
"It doesn't matter that she and Charlie are fictional, and they're made of paper. The designers had to draw a very squishy mattress for her to do her forward roll on."
Ms Child's comments came as Radio Times magazine compiled a shortlist of the best BBC children's characters through the decades, featuring the likes of Sooty and Sweep from the 1950s, The Magic Roundabout from the 1960s, Paddington Bear in the 1970s, Willo The Wisp in the 1980s and more recently, Teletubbies and In The Night Garden.
She also said that an episode she proposed in which Lola caught headlice was rejected by the Disney corporation, which had partially financed the show.
Richard Starzak, who devised the much-loved Shaun The Sheep, told the magazine that children's TV had become too safe.
"Slapstick is a universal language," he said. "There's a lot of comedy in other people's pain. But we don't want to be responsible for kids hitting each other with frying-pans. I sometimes think children's TV can be overly safe."
He said of watching ITV's Tiswas during his childhood: "They used to lift children out of tea chests by their ears. Can you imagine the front pages of the newspapers if that happened today?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article