THE Church of Scotland has been accused of a "total capitulation" over proposals to change the description of religious assemblies in schools.
Professor Donald Macleod, former Principal of the Free Church College in Edinburgh, also said the Kirk was guilty of "intellectual incoherence, theological illiteracy and sheer lack-of-fight" over the move.
The Kirk's Church and Society Council and the Humanist Society of Scotland have proposed to MSPs that "religious observance" should be changed to "time for reflection".
They said changing the legal definition could ease the concerns of parents who withdrew their children from them.
The move has attracted criticism from the Free Church this week and in the latest attack, Professor Macleod said: "Not only are they (the Kirk) guilty of total capitulation, aggravated by the fact that they are the official representatives of the Christian faith of the Scottish people, but they have laced their betrayal with sanctimonious humbug.
"How can a body professedly committed to converting men and women to faith in Jesus Christ describe as 'colleagues' a society committed to promoting atheism?"
But Rev Sally Foster-Fulton, convenor of the Kirk's Church and Society Council, said: "We are keen to ensure that these events remain at the heart of the spiritual development of young people of different faiths and of no faith.
"It would protect this important time in school life and would better describe the inclusive nature of assemblies."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article