ALL of local government in Scotland has been weakened by the departure of four authorities from its umbrella body, the country's most senior councillor has claimed.
David O'Neill, president of Cosla, said the organisation had finished last year "in an unhappy and unsatisfactory place" after Glasgow, Renfrewshire, South Lanarkshire and Aberdeen quit to set up a rival group.
In his first annual conference since last year's acrimonious split, Mr O'Neill said Cosla would spend the next year rebuilding, with the door still open for any of the four rebel authorities to return.
But he said the decision by four other councils to remain on board meant 2014 did not end as badly as it had threatened to.
In his keynote speech at the conference in Crieff, Mr O'Neill said the Referendum had overshadowed local government's attempts to secure more power for councils.
Last year Cosla called for the most radical overhaul of Scottish local government in decades, potentially tripling the number of councils and equipping them with major tax-raising powers by 2020.
But Mr O'Neill said the proposed Nordic-like model, which he described as "devolution within Scotland", had stalled.
He said: "Make no mistake, I feel the loss of any one member and the fact that four councils are still choosing to leave weakens the whole of local government including those four councils. Both myself and my political colleagues have done our best to create the circumstances where some felt able to change their decision.
"In one sense we ended the year in less difficulty than we might have but nevertheless, in terms of membership, in an unhappy and unsatisfactory place.
"I am convinced that there are enough councils and councillors who support that collective voice and from this position, we will become stronger not weaker."
The Cosla president added: "Here and now, for our most deprived communities, what happens within Scotland and how we are organised to deliver better outcomes is a much more pressing issue.
"Talks on devolution within Scotland seem to have stalled and, if anything, a more centralised approach within Scotland seems to be developing. Bits of this debate are ongoing but, in terms of real progress, little has changed."
In the context of oncoming further squeezes on local government finances, Mr O'Neill also called for a debate on the merits of universal services, claiming it was crucial "to avoid being seduced by the idea".
He said better-off people were more adept and successful in taking advantage of universal services, while those socially disadvantaged found it more difficult to access them and use them to help support their families.
He said: "To address this, I believe we must have a far greater focus on services which are specifically designed for particular communities and their circumstances."
Mr O'Neill also criticised the "national obsession with monitoring all services through a range of national targets", claimed the model of acute services was "now unfit for purpose and unaffordable" and added that while local solutions were best to tackle social disadvantage "we should not be distracted by these different circumstances".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article