COMIC book author Mark Millar has come to the defence of embattled arts funding body Creative Scotland.
The writer, whose work inspired Hollywood films Kick Ass and Wanted, said its policies were "entirely sensible for a body designed to build jobs and solid arts infrastructure".
Mr Millar, whose Kick Ass 2 film starring Jim Carrey and Nicolas Cage is being shot in England and Canada, said that if the body is "thinking mainstream" then the "policy is a good one".
His comments come after a stinging broadside from Don Paterson, the leading Scottish poet, who described the body as a "dysfunctional ant-heap".
Creative Scotland has been under fire in the arts community since it announced the scrapping of its regular Flexible Funding for more than 40 companies, plus unpopular decisions such as funding a cookery show to be made by STV.
The award-winning poet, honoured with the Queen's Gold Medal for Poetry in 2010, also criticised the idea of the Year of Creative Scotland in an article entitled A Post-Creative Scotland, which will appear in a book entitled Unstated: Writers on Scottish Independence, to be published by WordPower books in November.
Mr Paterson said Creative Scotland should be abolished and said it was the product of "a shocking SNP policy vacuum and a New Labour neo-managerialism incapable of understanding the difference between art and business".
The poet and editor said the £6.5 million Year of Creative Scotland was guilty of "vapidity and cynicism".
However, Mr Millar defended the chief executive of Creative Scotland, Andrew Dixon, saying his "policy is a good one".
"He's trying to help people asking him for finance to reach the widest possible audience," he said. "If you're a guy running a show like that with a limited amount of cash and an infinite amount of artists and writers needing it for a pet project you're always going to make enemies.
"It's hard because everybody thinks their project deserves to be funded or, if not theirs, a project their friend has been working on.
"But [Mr Dixon] has done a really good job and is moving in the right direction by asking creative people to be a little more savvy. Personally, I'm uncomfortable with the state being involved in culture at all – it's our job, as writers and artists, to be suspicious of government. All we need is a pen and paper."
Next week, Mr Dixon will appear at the Culture Committee of the Scottish Parliament, which will question him on the past year's activity at the funding body.
MSPs will hear that the vital infrastructure of the arts is facing "wanton destruction", papers released yesterday said.
In a written submission, public artist Matt Baker, who will also appear before MSPs, drew attention to the funding model. "The strategy seems to be to remove the core funding and instead support individual projects on the premise that this targeted support will allow/encourage organisations to become self-sustaining and independent of ongoing support," he writes.
"This strategy applied from a centralised national body, and without a complementary package of other measures, cannot work and will cause wanton destruction of vital arts infrastructure in the country."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The celebration of the year has embraced more than 5000 events and activities all over the country. All of these have benefited from extensive marketing and PR activity by VisitScotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article