SOCIETY risks being sucked into a potentially damaging moral panic over the Jimmy Savile sex abuse scandal, a Scots academic has warned.
Professor Viviene Cree, head of social work at Edinburgh University, said the reactions of the public and media, and ensuing political outrage can have damaging consequences by drawing attention away from child abuse and neglect.
Ms Cree said: "We are in the middle of a storm at the moment, one that appears every now and again, and always with the same negative consequences, for individuals and for society.
"This isn't to suggest that bad things don't happen – that people aren't hurt and children aren't abused. We acknowledge that abuse and neglect happen all the time, and it is right that we do something to protect those who are vulnerable.
"But we also need to find a balance in our response to this, otherwise we'll be left with the wider negative effects of a moral panic, with individuals being wrongly accused, organisations – like the BBC – being lambasted and politicians calling for legislation that may have the consequence of harming the very people it seeks to protect."
Ms Cree was speaking prior to a series of Edinburgh University seminars on moral panics, which begin tomorrow. The series, Revisiting Moral Panics: A Critical Examination of 21st Century Social Issues and Anxieties, will draw links between the reaction to the Savile events and previous societal over-reactions, such as fights between Mods and Rockers and Satanic abuse in Orkney.
l The BBC could drop its archive repeats of Top Of The Pops to avoid broadcasting episodes featuring Savile. Last week an edition fronted by Dave Lee Travis was dropped following his arrest last week over claims he groped two women.
BBC4 has been showing programmes from 1976 onwards, in sequence, and next year it would have been due to screen editions from 1978.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article