COMPUTER experts from St Andrews University have revealed that social networking sites did not help to incite the English riots.
A study of 2.4 million Twitter messages from the time of the riots in London and other cities in August found that politicians and other commentators were wrong to claim that the site was partly responsible for the disturbances.
In contrast, the university research team found Twitter was a force for good and helped to organise the clean-up.
The study, led by Professor Rob Procter of the University of Manchester, used St Andrews' world-leading cloud computing technology.
Mr Procter said: "Politicians and commentators were quick to claim that social media played an important role in inciting and organising riots, calling for sites such as Twitter to be closed should events of this nature happen again.
"But our study found no evidence of significance in the available data that would justify such a course of action in respect to Twitter."
The research, funded by the Joint Information Systems Committee, was only possible using St Andrews' large scale computing facilities.
Dr Alex Voss, from the university's School of Computer Science, said: "The cloud computing environment at St Andrews meant that we could quickly set up a multi-computer environment that could analyse a large volume of information quickly and accurately. "
The study found news rumours appear quickly on Twitter but often turn out to be false. An example was a rumour animals had been released from London Zoo, which was untrue.
Mr Procter added: "Only after a period of time does the influence of mainstream media organisations become critical for determining a rumour's credibility. But we do find the mainstream media is perfectly capable of picking up and publishing unverified information from social media without adhering to the usual standard of fact checking.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article