THE dramatic and forced resignation of Keith O'Brien as Scotland's most senior Catholic will not automatically see another cardinal installed in Scotland in the near future.
Although only the third churchman to wear the Red Mitre since the re- establishment of the Catholic hierarchy in the 1870s, the fact all were in recent times indicate the Vatican was appointing cardinals on the basis of geography.
All that was clearly changed with the appointment of Vincent Nichols as Archbishop of Westminster and the leader of England's four million-plus Catholics in 2009, without his being made cardinal.
The position taken by the outgoing Pope Benedict has been to appoint cardinals on merit and not on where they are.
There would appear to be a ready-made successor.
The Archbishop of Glasgow Philip Tartaglia is already head of the Bishops' Conference, the decision-making body for the church in Scotland, as well as being the leader of the largest congregation north of the Border.
He also has a profile and standing within senior Vatican circles.
However, lay sources say it could be this high- standing which could see Tartaglia accelerated through the Catholic ranks to become a Papal Nuncio.
The Vatican could, however, decide Scotland's current need was greater.
Bishop Hugh Gilbert of Aberdeen could be another contender as he is seen as deeply theological, although having been a monk for decades with little pastoral roles this could be a major disadvantage.
There are also a number of well-placed Scots within the Vatican who could be dispatched home in its hour of need.
Among those mentioned are Monsignors Patrick Burke and Leo Cushley, the current Pope's English translator.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article