ONE of Britain's top public officials, who was allowed to avoid tens of thousands of pounds in income tax under a deal approved by Government ministers, is to stand down.
Ed Lester, chief executive of the Glasgow-based Student Loans Company (SLC), announced his decision three months after the revelation that he had avoided deductions of around £40,000 a year by being paid via his private firm.
Mr Lester, whose basic salary is £140,000, has since been added to the payroll.
Yesterday the SLC said that Mr Lester would step down when his two-year contract expires at the end of January.
The SLC is now advertising for a new chief executive on an "attractive salary". The advert says the SLC board is looking for "an accomplished and credible senior leader - who is politically adept and demonstrates integrity at all times".
A spokeswoman for the SLC said: "Ed Lester's two-year contract ends on January 31, 2013. The process to recruit his replacement is under way now to ensure a smooth handover."
Mr Lester's pay deal, agreed by Danny Alexander, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, was disclosed in an HM Revenue & Customs letter obtained under freedom of information laws.
Mr Alexander insisted he did not know the arrangement allowed Mr Lester to avoid tax, and said the way in which Mr Lester received his £182,000 package, which included bonus payments and pension contributions, would be changed.
The sums were paid to Mr Lester's private company, allowing him to pay corporation tax of 21% instead of 50% income tax if he had been paid directly through the SLC payroll.
A review identified more than 2400 cases of public sector staff being employed indirectly, costing the taxman millions of pounds. Since January, 350 such contracts have been ended and tighter rules introduced.
Mr Alexander said everyone in the public sector "should be on the payroll and paying the correct amount of tax".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article