GEORGE Osborne has promised to "reset" Britain's banking system with a threat to break up the banks if they do not follow strict rules to ring-fence risky investment operations from savers' deposits.
The Chancellor also made clear that the forthcoming fine for Royal Bank of Scotland as part of the Libor-rigging scandal – expected to be up to £500 million – will be paid out of the bonuses of investment banking staff and not come from the taxpayer.
Outlining the UK Government's Banking Reform Bill, which went to Parliament yesterday, Mr Osborne told bankers in Bournemouth there would be no more "too big to fail" institutions and unveiled payment reforms to speed up the banking system.
His comments look likely to incur the wrath of the City after he pledged to introduce powers to "electrify the ring-fence", if lenders failed to split high street branch operations from the dealing floor.
The bill has reignited fears that Britain's biggest banks could move abroad, with the British Bankers' Association (BBA) warning the plans will damage London's attractiveness as a global financial centre. However, Lloyds Banking Group, which is part-taxpayer owned, distanced itself from the BBA's criticism of electrification.
Antonio Horta-Osorio, its chief executive, told the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards at Westminster that Lloyds had not been notified about the BBA's comments. "I do support electrification," he said.
In his speech, Mr Osborne said it was time the banks worked for their customers, and not the other way round, "so that when mistakes are made, it's the banks and not the taxpayer that picks up the bill".
The Chancellor explained he wanted to open up the payment system to ensure new players could access it in a fair and transparent way and so that customers and businesses would be able to move money around the system more quickly.
The new bill follows recommendations by the Independent Commission on Banking, led by Sir John Vickers in 2011, which came up with ways to make the sector safer and give greater protection to depositors in the wake of the financial crisis.
The Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards, set up in the wake of the Libor scandal, also called for reserve powers to break up the banks if they do not adhere to rules to separate investment and high street operations.
Anthony Browne, the BBA chief executive, said this would make it more difficult for banks to raise capital to lend to businesses and would also create uncertainty for investors.
However, Mr Osborne said: "When the RBS failed, my predecessor Alistair Darling felt he had no option but to bail the entire thing out. Not just RBS on the high street but the trading positions in Asia, the mortgage books in sub-prime America, the property punts in Dubai. I want to make sure that the next time a chancellor faces that decision, they have a choice – to keep the bank branches going, the cash machines operating, while letting the investment arm fail."
On RBS – 82% owned by the public – and Libor, he stressed: "Any UK fine will benefit the public. When it comes to RBS, I am clear that the bill for any US fine related to this investigation should on this occasion be paid for by the bankers and not the taxpayer."
Last night Labour Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls said: "He is refusing to legislate for a backstop power to allow for across-the-board separation of the banks." He made clear Labour would put down amendments to the bill to this effect.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article