According to official figures, Rangers and Hearts owe about £30m each, Kilmarnock and Aberdeen approximately £9m each, Dundee United £6.6m, and Hibernian £3.6m.
Deficits at the remaining SPL clubs are less acute.
According to one leading expert in the field of Scottish football finance, it would take major changes in those clubs’ circumstances for them to be finally be rid of that financial millstone.
Kicking off a series of investigations in The Herald into football’s finances, Stephen Morrow, head of Sports Science Studies at the University of Stirling,said: “It is difficult to see, in the current trading model that Scottish football is in, how they could find a way to pay that off. That’s not to say they can’t manage that debt.
“They can look after the interest payments on it but unless something changes to the structure or the finances of those clubs -- or something substantial changes to their trading environment -- then all they will be doing is very, very slowly bringing the debt down. But nothing dramatic is ever likely to happen.
“You’re not getting something new for it like a new stadium or training facility, you’re just using those sums to tread water.”
Mr Morrow does not expect an SPL club to enter adminstration in the immediate future but acknowledged that those with high levels of debt needed to tread carefully.
“I don’t necessarily think so at the moment [that a club could go into administration]. [But] there is always that risk as you have clubs effectively living on the edge as, if you have a club with a high level of debt, it doesn’t take much for it to go wrong.”
Contrary to public perception, though, Morrow dismissed suggestions that the banks are considering making major changes to the facilities offered to most Scottish clubs.
“In the overall scheme of things, with regards to bank debts and obligations, we are still talking about relatively small sums of money here,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article