THE head of the Unite union has attacked the inquiry into emails at the centre of the Falkirk vote-rigging allegations, calling it a waste of police time.
It emerged at the weekend that Police Scotland had dropped its investigation after finding no evidence of wrongdoing.
The mails - alleged to show attempts by Stevie Deans to help Unite secure a safe Labour seat for its preferred candidate, Karie Murphy - were given to police by Mr Deans' former employers at the Ineos oil refinery at Grangemouth.
Len McCluskey, Unite's general secretary, said that the decision to take no further action had "vindicated" the union's position that it had done nothing wrong.
He added: "It is shameful that the police's time has been wasted by vexatious complaints and their attentions diverted from catching real criminals."
He also defended Mr Deans, who last week was given a job by the union, saying he was a "decent and honourable man who had been smeared and hounded with a callous disregard for him and his family by those who should know better".
He added: "(This) witch-hunt has been exposed to be without foundation."
The Falkirk allegations centred on claims local people had been signed up as Labour members without their knowledge.
In July last year, Labour leader Ed Miliband accused Unite of attempting to fix the selection of the party's candidate for the 2015 General Election. But he was forced into an embarrassing climb-down months later when Unite was cleared.
Yesterday an Ineos spokesman said: "The email cache was referred to the police and the information commissioner based on legal advice to protect the company."
A Police Scotland spokesman said: "Following information received alleging misconduct by a member of staff at the Grangemouth refinery, a Police Scotland enquiry was undertaken.
"This inquiry has now concluded and there is no evidence of any criminality."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article