Sheriff courts will be deluged with cases and suffer delays under plans to overhaul the civil court structure, the body representing lawyers has warned.
Proposals to raise the threshold for cases to be heard by the Court of Session are included in the draft Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill before the Scottish Parliament.
Edinburgh's Court of Session can currently hear civil cases where the sum sued for is £5000 or more, but under the plans only cases valued at more than £150,000 will go to the Court of Session.
The Law Society of Scotland supports an increase in the threshold for Court of Session cases, but says it should be about £50,000.
The Scottish Court Service has already outlined plans to close 10 sheriff courts in a £4 million-a-year cost-cutting programme.
"If the proposals are implemented as currently drafted, a deluge of cases could hit Scotland's sheriff courts," said Kim Leslie, Convener of the Law Society of Scotland's Civil Justice Committee.
"There is a risk sheriff courts will be unable to cope with the volume of new work suddenly arriving at their door. We expect this to be made worse by the recent Scottish Government decision to support the closure of 20% of sheriff courts across Scotland.
"If sheriff courts are unable to cope with the increased workload, there could be significant delays for court users."
Ms Leslie's committee researched the effects of raising the threshold to £150,000. It found only 254 cases settled with a value higher than this figure, representing less than 2% of Court of Session business.
Ms Leslie added: "If the proposals are implemented as currently drafted, we could end up in the paradoxical situation of an almost completely deserted Court of Session, whilst court users in the sheriff courts suffer long delays as the courts struggle to cope with an increased workload. The Scottish Government is right to raise the threshold. However, we would prefer to see the limit set at no more than £50,000."
Sheriff courts in Dornoch, Duns, Kirkcudbright, Peebles, Rothesay, Cupar, Dingwall, Arbroath, Haddington and Stonehaven are earmarked for closure, with their business going to other locations.
Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman Alison McInnes MSP said: "On top of the proposals to shut a fifth of our sheriff courts, this reform would strain our sheriff courts to breaking point."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "The Scottish Government accepted the Scottish Court Service's proposals to change the structure of our courts. Their proposals are now being scrutinised by Parliament.
"The volume of business carried out in the sheriff courts recommended for closure is around 5% of the total business, which [the court service] is confident can be dealt with within a smaller number of better-equipped courts."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article