The widow of poisoned Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko has vowed to continue her quest for the truth after the Government refused her calls for a public inquiry into his death.
Marina Litvinenko said she was still "optimistic" that the full circumstances behind her husband's death would be exposed.
Her comments came after suffering another devastating setback in her pursuit of justice, as coroner Sir Robert Owen said the Government had rejected calls for a public inquiry to be set up in place of an inquest.
Outside the Royal Courts of Justice, in London, Mrs Litvinenko said: "Everyone was shocked and disappointed by the decision."
She added she wants to know why the Government made its decision.
Mrs Litvinenko said: "Were they trying to protect the Russian state? Were they trying to protect national security secrets?"
Mrs Litvinenko continued: "I'm optimistic, now so many people are involved in this case. More and more people want to know the truth."
She added that the way the Government handled its decision not to hold a public inquiry was "impolite and rude".
Alex Goldfarb, a friend of the Litvinenko family, attended the hearing to show his support.
Mr Goldfarb said: "It's absolutely transparent that the Russian government is behind this murder. The evidence has been seen by the Coroner and the courts.
"There's prima facie evidence that the Russian government is behind it.
"There's some sort of collusion with Her Majesty's Government and the Kremlin to obstruct justice."
Elena Tsirlina, Mrs Litvinenko's solicitor, said the decision not to hold a public inquiry followed "months of talks between the two governments at the highest level" between the prime ministers of both Russia and Britain.
Mr Litvinenko, 43, was poisoned with radioactive polonium-210 while drinking tea at the Millennium Hotel in London's Grosvenor Square in 2006. The family believe he was working for MI6 at the time of his death.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article