A woman mauled to death by a tiger at the wildlife park where she worked was doing her "dream job", her mother has told an inquest.
Sarah McClay, 24, from Glasgow, suffered multiple injuries when she was attacked at South Lakes Wild Animal Park in Dalton-in-Furness, Cumbria, on May 24 last year.
Miss McClay was going about her routine duties in the big cat enclosure at the park when she came into contact with a male Sumatran tiger.
She was taken by air ambulance to Royal Preston Hospital but later died from her injuries.
Police said at the time of her death that the enclosure consisted of a number of indoor and outdoor compartments connected by lockable doors. Keepers were required to enter various parts of the enclosure in the course of their routine duties.
However, systems were said to be in place to ensure that animals and keepers remained apart at all times.
Speaking on the first day of the inquest, which is being held in front of a jury, Fiona McClay, from Linlithgow, told the hearing in Kendal that her daughter was "a meticulous person to the extreme" who was "settled in her life".
She said Miss McClay had worked as an animal carer at the park for approximately three years.
South Cumbria Coroner Ian Smith asked her what her daughter's attitude was to her occupation.
Mrs McClay replied: "It was a dream job ... I would say ever since she had visited the park as a child."
She had a liking for the "animal world of Great Britain" and did not have "a particular affinity" for big cats but she saw it as "a privilege" to work with them, said Mrs McClay.
She confirmed Miss McClay was in a relationship with her partner, David Shaw, at the time.
Mr Smith asked her: "Were they happy together?" Mrs McClay replied: "Oh very."
She said she believed her daughter did not have any health or money problems.
The coroner asked: "Happy with what she was doing?" Mrs McClay said: "She was settled in her life."
Asked by Mr Smith about her personality, Mrs McClay said: "She was a meticulous person to the extreme. She would never just do something. She always wanted to do it a little bit better.
"She was a conversational person. She would discuss things and she would be never be critical of anyone else and would listen to their point of view."
Speaking about media coverage, which contained calls for the tiger to be killed, Mrs McClay said: "That is absolutely 100 per cent not what Sarah would not have wanted. She would not have blamed the tiger for anything what had happened."
A post-mortem examination showed that among Miss McClay's unsurvivable injuries were deep puncture wounds to the neck, the back of her body, both arms and her left foot.
Bruising and abrasions to her head and back were consistent with her being dragged along the ground, the inquest heard.
Reopening the inquest at the town's County Hall, which is scheduled to last up to six days, Mr Smith told the jury of six women and four men that the nature of the case was "extremely unusual".
He told them: "Your job is to decide the facts. To decide what actually happened because it is not altogether clear at this stage."
A scale model of the tiger house was inspected by the jury yesterday.
A short video of the park's tiger house, filmed last June, was also shown in court.
Jurors were told their attention would be focused on the left side of the enclosure.
The jury will visit the park this morning before more evidence is taken later.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article