WOMEN now account for just over a fifth of directors on boards of top companies after a "culture change" in British business over the past three years, according to a new report.
Former trade minister Lord Davies of Abersoch headed a review in 2011 when the number of female board members in FTSE 100 firms was just 12.5%.
He set a target of 25% by 2015, and reported that the figure stands at 20.7%, showing "real progress", with more women than ever before in boardrooms of leading companies.
A separate report by the Cranfield School of Management confirmed the trend and revealed that just two FTSE 100 companies - Glencore Xstrata and Antofagasta - had all-male boards, compared to one in five in 2011.
Of the 1117 FTSE 100 board positions, 231 are women, while 48 new female appointments need to be made to reach the 25% target.
Lord Davies said: "The rate of change that we have seen in our biggest companies over the last three years has been impressive.
"The voluntary approach is working and companies have got the message that better balanced boards bring real business benefits.
"However, the eyes of the world are on us as we enter the home straight. They are judging us as to whether the voluntary approach, rather than regulation, will work."
Professor Susan Vinnicombe, director of the Cranfield International Centre for Women Leaders, said: "Whilst it is encouraging to see the figures moving in the right direction, the issue still remains that women are not being appointed to executive positions, despite there being a wealth of suitable candidates."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article