THE number of people working beyond state pension age has almost doubled to 1.4 million in the past 20 years, figures show.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the numbers were relatively stable until 2000 but then increased to a peak of 1.45 mil- lion in 2010.
One-third of older workers were self-employed, compared with 13% of those below the state pension age, while older employees were twice as likely to work part-time in full-time posts.
The ONS said those remaining in the labour market over pension age worked fewer hours, possibly helped by the support of their state pension and other pension arrangements, allowing them to fit their work around other engagements.
Dr Ros Altmann, director-general of Saga, said: "Many older people are choosing to stay at work, often part-time so that they ease more gently into retirement. If they feel fit and healthy and want more money, and are able to work, they are choosing to do so.
"Saga's research shows that many of our over-50s already want to work past 65. Around 71% would like to work part-time rather than retiring and in fact 7% are already working past the age of 70.
"This isn't just for the money – work satisfaction, feeling useful and the social benefits we gain from working were key reasons that people wanted to continue."
Darren Philp, policy director of the National Association of Pension Funds, added: "Our rapidly changing demographic is hitting home. Having more older people in the workforce will become the norm. Many are choosing to ease into their retirement for social and financial reasons, and part-time work is a popular option. Employers also value the skills and experience of older staff.
"The problem comes as people want to retire but end up stuck at work as they cannot afford to leave. With half the workforce not saving into a pension, this is going to become a painful reality for millions."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article