Veteran Labour politician Tam Dalyell has given his backing to Jeremy Corbyn's bid to become the next leader of the party.
The former MP and father of the House of Commons endorsed Mr Corbyn's campaign during an appearance at the Edinburgh International Book Festival.
Mr Dalyell said he had worked closely with Mr Corbyn in the past on issues including their opposition to the Iraq war and described him as "a listener" who would bring "a whole lot of young people" into the Labour Party.
In conversation with broadcaster James Naughtie, he said: "I would give Jeremy Corbyn a chance. I will be voting for him.
"Before you dismiss him, just consider this fact. In 1983 he held a majority of 4,000-plus, in 2015 it was 21,000-plus. Doesn't that tell you something?"
Mr Corbyn has become the frontrunner ahead of fellow candidates Andy Burnham, Yvette Cooper and Liz Kendall in the battle to succeed Ed Miliband, who Mr Dalyell described as "appalling".
He emphasised the election was for a leader of the opposition, describing Mr Corbyn only as "a possible alternative prime minister".
He added: "He might well at the age of 68, because he's that type of a person, say 'alright I've done what's good for the party, we'll leave it to somebody else'.
"The somebody else would not be Ms Cooper, would not be Ms Kendall and would not be Mr Burnham. Possibly Dan Jarvis, but there are a number of other names."
Mr Dalyell first posed the West Lothian Question in 1977, on whether non-English MPs should be able to vote on matters that affect only England post-devolution, when English MPs do not have a vote on matters that have been devolved.
The UK Government has set out plans for English votes for English laws, known as Evel, after sweeping new powers were promised to Holyrood in the wake of last year's Scottish independence referendum.
Mr Dalyell, who opposes further devolution and believes that the Scottish Parliament should be abolished, said he did not think that independence was inevitable.
He said: "I think that good sense will prevail. That there will not be another referendum for a generation, that was what was promised."
He added: "As time goes on I think that you may find that the SNP group in the House of Commons become less enchanted with directions from Edinburgh and there's a very real problem.
"It's completely new in the House of Commons that decisions should be directed by someone who is not a member of the House of Commons, and the English are beginning to resent that."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here