Labour is being investigated by the elections watchdog over its failure to submit receipts for the so-called Ed Stone.
Invoices for the campaign stunt, which sparked widespread ridicule, totalling £7,830 have now been submitted by the party.
But the Electoral Commission, which released the documents, said it will be "investigating Labour over what happened".
Ed Miliband's manifesto commitments were carved on the 8ft stone in an attempt by the party to show it was serious about meeting its pledges.
The move backfired, however, when it was widely derided on social media and mocked by political opponents.
Basingstoke firm stoneCIRCLE supplied and carved the stone and its total bill came to £5,400. London company PAYE Stone Restoration charged £2,430 for putting it in place, transporting it and storing it for the 12 weeks up to July 28 last year.
The receipts were the most eagerly anticipated item of election spending when the Electoral Commission released its records earlier this week, but it soon emerged that they had not been included in the thousands of pages of invoices.
Labour blamed an "administrative error" for its failure to include the items with the rest of its campaign spend.
It faces a fine of up to £20,000 if it is found to have seriously breached the rules.
An Electoral Commission spokesman said it was considering the issue "in line with our enforcement policy".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here