American singer Bob Dylan has been hailed as "a great poet in the English-speaking tradition" following his surprise win of the Nobel Prize in Literature.
The 75-year-old was given the prestigious accolade for "having created new poetic expressions within the great American song tradition".
The last American to have won the literature prize was Beloved author Toni Morrison in 1993.
Permanent Secretary at the Swedish Academy, Sara Danius, said he was deserving of the prize, adding: "He is a great poet in the English-speaking tradition, and he is a wonderful sampler, a very original sampler, he embodies the tradition.
"And for 54 years now he's been at it and re-inventing himself constantly, creating a new identity."
Speaking after making the announcement, in a video posted to the official Twitter page of the Nobel Prize, Danius said she hoped there would not be criticism over the decision.
She suggested that anyone wanting to "start listening or start reading" Dylan should use the famous lyricist's 1966 Blonde on Blonde album as a starting point.
She said that particular body of work was a good example of his "brilliant way of rhyming and putting together refrains and his pictorial thinking".
Born Robert Zimmerman on May 24 1941, in the backwaters of Minnesota, he reinvented himself as Bob Dylan.
He is considered one of the greatest lyricists of modern times having penned memorable hits such as Blowin' In The Wind and The Times They Are A-Changin'.
Asked about broadening the horizons of the prize, given that Dylan has not written novels in the "usual sense", Danius said Dylan's works were comparable to those of the ancient Greek lyric poet Sappho and Homer, author of The Iliad and Odyssey.
"It may look that way but really we haven't (broadened the horizons), if you look back 2,500 years ago you discover Homer and Sappho, they wrote poetic texts that were meant to be listened to, they were meant to be performed with instruments and it's the same with Bob Dylan," she explained.
"He can be read and should be read and is a great poet in the grand English-speaking tradition".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here