Jeremy Corbyn has sought to clarify his position on a second Scottish independence referendum, saying Westminster should not block it going ahead but that a breakaway would be "catastrophic".
As Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon prepared to deliver an "important speech" on Monday, with speculation mounting that she could outline plans for a second referendum, Mr Corbyn insisted he was not in favour of another vote.
The Labour leader faced a furious backlash from Labour MPs after telling Press Association Scotland it is "absolutely fine" for another vote to go ahead on Scottish independence.
READ MORE: Speculation First Minister Nicola Sturgeon set to announce new Scottish independence vote today
Clarifying his position on Monday, he said it would be "wrong" for the UK Parliament to block another vote going ahead if the Scottish Parliament was in favour of it.
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "If the Scottish Parliament decided they wanted to have a referendum then it would be wrong for Westminster to block it.
"But let's be absolutely clear, I do not think there should be another referendum, I think that independence would be economically catastrophic for many people in Scotland, it would lead to a sort of turbo-charged austerity with the levels of income the government has in Scotland and because of the very low oil prices and the high dependency on oil tax income."
READ MORE: Final hurdle for Brexit bill as Theresa May moves closer to launching Article 50
On Saturday, when he was asked if a second independence referendum appeared inevitable given the gulf between Ms Sturgeon's goal of keeping Scotland in the single market and Theresa May's plans for a UK-wide "hard Brexit", Mr Corbyn told PA Scotland: "If a referendum is held then it is absolutely fine, it should be held.
"I don't think it's the job of Westminster or the Labour Party to prevent people holding referenda."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel