TOUGH new guidance urging GPs to report patients who continue to drive when not medically fit has come into force.
New advice by the General Medical Council (GMC) states doctors have a duty to inform the authorities if a patient is driving against medical advice. From today doctors do not need a patient’s consent to alert the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) or Driver and Vehicle Agency (DVA) in Northern Ireland when a patient has continued driving.
The advice says GPs should “make every reasonable effort” to persuade a patient unfit to drive to stop, and then inform the authorities if there is a “risk of death or serious harm” to others. Doctors should try to inform a patient of their intention to disclose information before calling the DVLA or DVA.
Steve Gooding, director of motoring research charity the RAC Foundation, said: “The worst thing people can do is ignore what they are told by their GP, because if they don’t inform the licensing body, the GP should and will.”
But AA president Edmund King said: “Rather than introducing tough medical tests across the board, we would prefer to see GPs take a more active role in telling their patients they are unfit to drive.”
The new rules comes after Glasgow bin lorry driver Harry Clarke admitted driving in the knowledge he had suffered a loss of consciousness while at the wheel of a refuse collection vehicle on December 22 2014, resulting in six deaths and leaving 15 more people injured.
Jack and Lorraine Sweeney, 68 and 69, and their granddaughter Erin McQuade, 18, Stephenie Tait, 29, Jacqueline Morton, 51, and Gillian Ewing, 52, died in the incident. A fatal accident inquiry heard Clarke had a history of health issues but had not disclosed his medical background to his employers or the DVLA.
Clarke, 60, admitted culpable and reckless driving on a separate occasion nine months after the tragedy.
Dr Barry Parker, of medical defence organisation MDDUS, said: “There are situations where a doctor may have to disclose confidential information to protect the public interest.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel