WORK has ground to a halt on a section of the new £1.4 billion road bridge over the River Forth after a routine concrete pour was botched.
The error has set back progress on the Queensferry Crossing by around a fortnight, but Transport Scotland insisted the project would still be delivered within budget.
Disaster struck on June 5 when pipes carrying concrete from sea level to an upper deck of the north tower burst.
Workers had reportedly warned bosses that the cement was too stiff and would wreck the pipes but were told to press on.
A source said: "There was a delay transferring the the concrete from the shore to the base of the tower. By the time it got there it had started to stiffen up.
"When they started to pump it up, some of the pipes exploded. It was sheer luck that no one was badly injured or killed.
"A few of the lads told them to stop the job because the concrete wasn't correct but bosses told them to press on regardless.
"They'd poured about six lorry loads of mix before they realised it wasn't working and pulled the plug. When it set it was useless - it was far too brittle."
The new bridge is set to open to traffic next year, but buses, pedestrians and cyclists will continue to use the existing Forth Road Bridge.
A spokesman for Transport Scotland said: "Some difficulties were encountered on the first concrete pour on the north tower deck last Friday, causing the pour to be stopped.
"The small quantity of concrete placed has already been removed, cleaning work is underway and we expect to be in a position to pour the concrete in this area next week.
"The project has a set budget range of £1.35 billion to £1.4bn. This remains unchanged."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article