A NEW high-level bridge crossing the River Ness and Caledonian Canal is among three options being considered for a road to ease traffic congestion in Inverness.
A £75.8 million plan to tunnel under the canal was ruled out by councillors as a working group met to consider eight options.
Inverness needs a ring road to link the A82 Fort William road with the A9 to Perth and in turn the A96 to Aberdeen but the river and canal cause a problem.
The Highland councillors selected three choices for further consideration.
The cheapest option would see a low-level swing bridge built over the canal near the Tomnahurich Bridge. There would be a roundabout at the western end, with the road following the canal embankment before crossing the River Ness on another low bridge.
Another option, priced at £27.2m, features a swing bridge and a low-level river crossing but has a different road route. The final option, priced at £67.8m, is for a high-level bridge crossing both canal and river.
However, land reform campaigner Andy Wightman claims some of the land belongs to the Inverness Common Good Fund.
The council believes this claim is false, but is checking all relevant documents.
The working group will meet again on February 17 before making a recommendation to the full Highland Council on March 1.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article