Scotland's main ferry operator CalMac has announced a four-year high in the number of passengers using its services last year.
The figures are up from 4,594,520 in 2013 to 4,653,958, a difference of 1.29 per cent. The last time passenger numbers topped this figure was in 2010 at 4,736,552.
It was even better for cars, with the highest carrying figures since 2009 with 2014's 1,095,816 representing a rise of 2.96 per cent over 2013.
Commercial carriage in 2014 was 92,734, a marginal rise of 0.16 per cent, while the only area to see a minor drop was the fall of 60 coaches from 2013's 11,210 to 11,150 in 2014, a fluctuation of -0.54 per cent.
Overall, the Clyde route of Ardrossan to Brodick on Arran carried the most passengers, 715,048, while another Clyde favourite of Wemyss Bay to Rothesay carried more cars and commercial vehicles than any other , 147,501 and 12,902 respectively.
The route with the lowest carriage was the new Mallaig to Lochboisdale run, though, it was a winter-only new addition in 2013 which was particularly badly hit by cancellations due to bad weather.
Another new route, the summer-only Ardrossan to Campbeltown sailing, also introduced in 2013, carried 11,343 passengers on the Ayrshire coast to Kintyre connection, a 15.46 per cent increase on 2013. This was accompanied by a 14.2 per cent jump for cars, a rise of 300 per cent for coaches from three to 12 and a hike of 19 commercial vehicles to 31, a 158.33 per cent increase.
There was also an upward trend, too, for the Small Isles of Rum, Eigg, Muck and Canna, with a 15.46 per cent rise in passenger figures taking the annual total to 29,865, as well as a 22.13 per cent increase for cars to 1,126 in 2014.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article