Taxpayers could be left with an even-bigger multimillion-pound bill for the West Coast main line fiasco than first feared, Labour claimed.
Shadow Transport Secretary Maria Eagle said train firms might sue for losses suffered when the UK Government scrapped its decision to award the franchise to FirstGroup.
The company's share price fell 20%, wiping millions off its value.
Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin faced calls to abandon plans to re-privatise the East Coast main line amid the mess surrounding the West Coast deal, which has sparked two inquiries and will cost taxpayers at least £40 million in refunding bidders.
Ms Eagle said: "The cost to taxpayers is likely to be in the tens of millions of pounds more.
"You're going to be handing millions over to companies, millions spent running three competitions for this franchise when you should have only been running one, and millions more if companies decide to sue for the losses your department's incompetence has caused them.
"Don't taxpayers deserve a truly independent inquiry into who was to blame for their money being poured down the drain?"
Mr McLoughlin said he ordered two inquiries because "I wanted to get to the bottom of this".
Labour MP Chi Onwurah said: "We have seen GNER fail, National Express fail, but now we have East Coast Trains returning £187m to taxpayers. Why on earth would the minister want to swap that for the unmitigated disaster of the West Coast tender?"
Mr McLoughlin said the contracting out would go ahead as it delivered value for money.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article