Details of the kind of service passengers can expect when the government owned East Coast line returns to the private sector are being laid out today.
Labour and rail unions have been among those bitterly opposed to the refranchising of the Scotland to London King's Cross route which has been run in the public sector for four years.
The RMT union has said that the prospectus being revealed today will see a return to "third-class travel" on the line.
The RMT and others have also pointed out that the East Coast has proved a real value-for-money line in that it has returned large amounts of money to the Treasury since National Express pulled out of the franchise in November 2009.
Labour has also expressed disappointment that, with the franchise programme on the railways put back and altered following the botched West Coast franchise bidding process, the Government has appeared to prioritise the refranchising of the East Coast railway line - which is scheduled for early 2015 - for political purposes.
Shadow transport secretary Mary Creagh said: "David Cameron should tackle his Government's cost-of-living crisis and cap rail fare rises for struggling commuters, instead of obsessing about handing East Coast over to the private sector.
"East Coast is working well and will have returned £800 million to the taxpayer by the end of this financial year.
"This Government has learned nothing from the West Coast franchising fiasco, which saw more than £50m of taxpayers' money wasted in compensation to train companies because of ministers' incompetence."
The RMT union has said that it understands the East Coast contract would be awarded "on lucrative, profiteering terms that will enable them to reduce the quality of service [and] introduce a new band of third-class travel".
However it is thought that the so-called "third class" will involve an offer of an airline-style "premium economy" service, between the present standard class and first class.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article