DEMANDS that the Scottish Government be given greater powers over how it runs Scotland's railway have been rejected by Westminster, provoking a furious response from the SNP.
UK Transport Secretary Justine Greening claimed it would not be sensible to break up what she said was a coherent GB structure and insisted the power of Scottish ministers to set fares and specify services was adequate.
Her refusal follows calls by the SNP to alter UK-wide rail legislation to allow for reforms to be introduced in Scotland. It also comes amid protest over how the Department for Transport handled a rail franchise award that saw Virgin Trains replaced by First Group as West Coast Mainline franchisee.
Ms Greening's response is contained in separate letters written to Infrastructure Secretary Alex Neil and Keith Brown, his Transport Minister, which have been seen by The Herald.
Power to modify fares and specify services through the ScotRail franchise – which accounts for more than 95% of passenger services north of the Border – has already been devolved to Scotland.
However, the SNP has complained more radical reform of the railway, such as reintegrating track and train companies that were separated during rail privatisation, is prevented by these laws.
As such, it would be possible for foreign state-owned rail companies such as Deutsche Bahn to bid to run ScotRail but impossible for the Scottish Government to set up a company to enter the same competition, the SNP has complained.
However, in a letter to Mr Neil, Ms Greening said: "It would not be sensible to run the railway in such a way that the Scottish Parliament could overturn the framework that governs the operation of passenger services on a GB basis.
"Our policy is to maintain a unified, national rail network but one that is subject to appropriate oversight by the Scottish ministers. This is what the current system achieves."
The response was criticised by Mr Brown, who said: "Our ambition to revolutionise rail services in Scotland is severely restricted by existing legislation.
"Although we are investing vast amounts of funding in the sector, we don't have enough influence over how railways here are operated, managed and regulated."
Mr Brown claimed the decision was also at odds with the UK Government's own consultation on rail services, which found passengers would benefit from decisions being made locally.
However, Richard Baker, transport spokesman for Labour, said both the SNP and Coalition responses were uninspiring.
He said: "This is a fairly uninspiring response to a fairly uninspiring letter. Alex Neil couldn't help himself from making this a constitutional fight without thinking about what is best for Scotland using the extensive additional powers on railways Labour devolved to Scottish ministers in 2005.
"Those who try to confuse radical changes on railways with independence are making a big mistake. We need both governments working together to deliver the best deal for passengers travelling across Britain."
Mr Baker said a not-for-profit model for running trains in place of the current franchise system should be considered but said this was not ruled out by current legislation.
Transport Scotland, the Government agency responsible for rail services, had undertaken considerable work on radical reform of the railways prior to the publication of a major consultation, Rail 2014.
However, the consultation document confirmed more radical proposals had not been considered possible due to UK legislation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article