A PLEDGE to remove the controversial average speed cameras from the A9 if they prove ineffective has been warmly welcomed by those concerned they could have a negative impact on the economy of the north.
Transport Minister Keith Brown reportedly made the commitment at a meeting with the Federation of Small Businesses in Inverness.
Amanda Frazer, regional chairwoman of the FSB, said members were pleased by what Mr Brown said. She added: "The minister did say that the impact of the cameras would be continually assessed and agreed that, if they prove to be ineffective in improving road safety, they would be withdrawn."
Stewart Nicol, chief executive of Inverness Chamber of Commerce said it indicated the minister was aware of the cameras' potential to damage business and tourism.
Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander, whose Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey constituency has the A9 running through it, said he welcomed that the Scottish Government seemed to be getting the message. "This shows the effectiveness of the Highlands speaking with a united voice on this issue."
But a spokeswoman for Transport Scotland said: "Every road safety measure is subject to regular review. It will take time to assess their effectiveness but The A9 Safety Group is clear that average speed cameras are effective in saving lives."
She added: "Before and after studies of other average speed camera sites in the UK show a reduction in accidents. We firmly believe a safer and more reliable route will be more effective for business and help attract more visitors."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article