THE Scottish Government's policy on cheap ferry fares is economically illiterate, according to a leading authority on the industry.
Professor Neil Kay's comments on Road Equivalent Tariff (RET) were last night embraced by hauliers on the Western Isles who say they are now facing fare increases of up to 175%.
The Scottish Government said last month it was going to roll out RET to the rest of the CalMac network after it delivered up to 50% cuts in fares to the Outer Isles, Coll and Tiree in a pilot scheme. But it would no longer apply to commercial vehicles.
The scale of the increases led to more than 60 hauliers and other businesses forming the Outer Hebrides' Transport Group.
Economist Professor Kay, of Strathclyde University, who has made a study of the ferry industry, believes the Government's approach to RET is misguided.
He said: "What is the point of offering a shop assistant in Stornoway cheap fares to the mainland if she cannot afford even those fares because the business she worked for has just gone bust? You do not need an economist to answer that question – just common sense. No self-respecting economist would support RET as a device to get fares down."
David Wood, of Woody's Express in Stornoway, said: "If the SNP is willing to blithely tell every family in the islands an increase of £400 (or 172%) to take a lorry on a return journey between North Uist and Skye is an "exaggeration", it dosn't have an understanding of arithmetic or sense of proportion."
But a Transport Scotland spokesman said RET had been positive, particularly in "boosting the local tourist trade and local economies as a result, and we want to see that continue".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article