TRAIN signallers will stage two 24-hour strikes later this month due to an ongoing row over whether staff are promoted according to seniority or merit.
The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) announced the strikes to be held on Monday, January 23, and Friday, January 27, at the west of Scotland signalling centre, which is responsible for operating services from Glasgow Central Station –around one-fifth of those in Scotland.
The union claimed it had "rock solid" support during a 72-hour strike that affected some services on Boxing Day. However, Network Rail, which is responsible for signalling, said 95% of services had operated as normal and it was confident of running a "comprehensive service" during the next two walkouts.
Bob Crow, general secretary of the RMT, said: "RMT has tried to reach a negotiated settlement to this unilateral ripping-up of a local arrangement, but unfortunately the management has refused to see sense and has failed to engage with us at all since the strike action over Christmas.
"RMT members will not stand by while management unilaterally rips up agreements and practices that have been in place at local level for decades."
The dispute affects 32 staff working at the west of Scotland signalling centre, which was built in 2008 with investment of £20 million, and concerns a practice dating back to the 1970s known as "slotting in", in which the most senior member of staff is automatically appointed to any vacant position.
Network Rail has claimed the slotting-in system is outdated and staff should be appointed on merit.
A spokesman said a stumbling block in negotiations with the union has been that it would have to sack a signal worker who was appointed as he was considered the best candidate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article