COUNCILLORS risk setting back economic development in Inverness by years unless they make a decision soon on a new road to ease congestion, construction chiefs have warned.
A meeting of the full Highland Council to consider the Inverness West Link road is due to be held next month.
The Highland Building Employers' Association says failure to make a decision at that meeting will send the project "back to the drawing board".
A West Link, crossing the River Ness and the Caledonian Canal, has been described by senior council officials as vital to tackling congestion and crucial for the growth of the city.
The development is expected to make the city more attractive for shoppers and businesses, as well as open up areas to the west of the city such as Torvean and around Ness Castle.
A high-level bridge, costing £67.8 million, that crosses the river and canal is among three options being considered.
The cheapest would involve a low-level swing bridge built over the canal near the Tomnahurich Bridge, a roundabout at the western end, with the road following the canal embankment before crossing the River Ness on another low bridge.
The third option, costing £27.2m, has a swing bridge and low-level river crossing, but a different road route.
A public consultation on the project was launched in December 2010 with a further period in November last year. A cross-party council group has shortlisted the three options from the original eight. It will meet on February 17 before recommending its preferred option on March 1.
Highland Building Employers' Association president, Willie Gray, said: "Even if a decision is made quickly, it will be a further four years before construction begins.
"If there is a further delay, I dread to think how long we will have to wait for the project to start."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article