The Syrian boyfriend of US hostage Kayla Mueller who died in the hands of Islamic State (IS) terrorists has said she remained selfless even while she was held captive.
Omar Alkhani said he returned to Syria months after he and Ms Mueller, 26, from Prescott, Arizona, were captured at gunpoint outside a hospital, to try to secure her release by posing as her husband.
But when he and aid worker Ms Mueller came face to face while she was in a detention cell in Syria, she denied being his wife.
Had she told her captors she was married to Mr Alkhani, she might have been freed from the hands of the IS militants, he said.
The US government and Ms Mueller's family confirmed her death last week. Since then, hundreds of people have gathered to honour her in her home town and in Flagstaff, where she attended Northern Arizona University. IS claims she was killed in a Jordanian air strike.
Mr Alkhani had persuaded a string of people to let him plead for her release, but he left the room empty-handed and said he was thrown into another cell. He said he saw her face for just a few seconds when guards uncovered it to show it was Ms Mueller.
The guards told Ms Mueller that Mr Alkhani would not be harmed if she told the truth, so she apparently did to save him, rather than take the slim chance to save herself, he said.
"Since she's American, they would not let her go anyway. No sense to stay here, both of us," Mr Alkhani said. "Maybe she wanted to save me. Maybe she didn't know I came back to save her."
Mr Alkhani spoke from Turkey in one of his first interviews, telling how he met Ms Mueller in 2010 and the last time he saw her in 2013 as a prisoner of IS.
She and Mr Alkhani were taken hostage in August 2013 after leaving a Doctors Without Borders hospital in Aleppo, Syria, where he was hired to fix the internet connection.
Ms Mueller had begged him to let her tag along so she could see the suffering first hand and help, despite the dangers of travelling into the war-torn region. He said he agreed reluctantly.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article