Two journalists with the Al-Jazeera English network have been released from an Egyptian prison after more than a year behind bars on terror-related charges in a case denounced as a sham by rights groups and the international community.
Mohammed Fahmy and Baher Mohammed were freed pending a retrial and have been reunited with their families in Cairo.
A third co-worker, Australian Peter Greste, was freed two weeks ago and deported to his home-country.
Mr Baher was initially sentenced to 10 years in prison and Mr Fahmy to seven years, but Egypt's top appeals court ordered a retrial after overturning the initial ruling, citing "flawed evidence". On the first session of the retrial yesterday, the judge ordered their release.
Their next court hearing is due on February 23 and they have to check in at a police station every day until then.
Mr Fahmy's brother said he had posted £21,500 in bail to grant his brother's release.
Mr Mohammed's wife Jehane Rashed said her husband had arrived home and was playing with his children - one of whom was born during his detention.
He said: "I will continue fighting for the freedom of expression and I will not back off."
The Al-Jazeera reporters spent more than 400 days in prison after being caught in the bitter feud between Egypt and Qatar, main backer of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood, the group ousted president Mohammed Morsi belonged to.
The court could eventually throw out the case, acquit them, convict them but sentence them to time served, or impose more prison time, with the possibility of a pardon from president Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi.
Like Mr Greste, Mr Fahmy, who is Canadian, could also be deported, but prospects for Mr Baher, who only has Egyptian citizenship, remain murkier.
Cairo has signalled it wants to resolve the case and end the criticism ahead of a major economic conference next month to drum up international investment. Egypt's staggered parliamentary elections are also due to start in March.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article