EUROPEAN Union governments have rejected efforts by Britain and France to lift an arms embargo on weapon supplies to Syrian rebels.
Opponents of the move said letting weapons be sent to the rebels could spark an arms race and worsen regional instability.
France and Britain found little support for their plan at a summit in Brussels yesterday, diplomats said, but EU foreign ministers will consider the issue again next week.
French President Francois Hollande, backed by Prime Minister David Cameron, pressed for the ban to be lifted, saying Europe could not let Syrians be massacred.
According to the UN, 70,000 Syrians have been killed during the two-year revolt against President Bashar al-Assad.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, a leading backer of the arms embargo, said there was a danger Mr Assad's allies, Russia and Iran, could step up arms supplies to him if the EU lifted its restrictions.
Britain and France wanting to drop the ban didn't mean the rest of the EU's 27 states must follow suit, she said. She added: "One must also be aware of the fragile situation in Lebanon and what that means for the arming of Hezbollah."
German officials cite events in North Africa, where guns smuggled out of Libya have helped arm Islamists in Mali.
European Council President Herman van Rompuy said leaders had asked foreign ministers to look at the embargo "as a matter of priority" at a meeting in Dublin on March 22. Mr Hollande said he had guarantees from the Syrian opposition that any arms delivered to them would end up in the right hands.
"I will do everything so that at the end of May at the very latest ... a common solution is adopted by the Union," he said.
One of the concerns over lifting the embargo is that some of the rebel units are hardline Islamists.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article