SOME residents were allowed to return to their homes over the weekend to take a first look at the damage caused by a deadly blast at a Texas fertiliser blast.
Authorities set strict rules for those let back into the area, only allowing access to some streets for them to retrieve belongings, and a 7pm curfew was set for those who stayed overnight.
"If they want to stay, it's at their own risk," said Steve Vanek, a West City Council member, who warned of the hazards of broken glass and nails and limited access to water and electricity.
The fire and ensuing explosion at West Fertilizer Co on Wednesday night flattened sections of the town.
It gutted an apartment complex, demolished 50 houses and battered a nursing home and several schools. Dozens more homes were damaged.
Authorities said the death toll was 14, with 200 people injured.
Most of the confirmed dead were emergency workers who attended the initial fire and were killed by the blast, which was big enough to register as a magnitude 2.1 earthquake.
Crews were working to restore running water to downtown businesses, and tractor trailers hauled portable classrooms into town for displaced students. Authorities have said there was no indication of foul play, although the investigation into the blast continues.
Donald Adair, owner of the plant's parent company, Adair Grain Inc, said on Friday he was heartbroken about the losses suffered by so many families in the community.
The plant was last inspected for safety in 2011, according to the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The company, which has fewer than 10 employees, had provided no contingency plan to the EPA for a major explosion or fire. It told the EPA in 2011 a typical emergency at the facility, which holds anhydrous ammonia, could mean a small gas release.
The EPA fined the firm $2300 (£1500) in 2006 for failing to implement a risk management plan.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article