PRESIDENT Barack Obama put his re-election bid back on a firm footing with a strong debating performance that is likely to thrill his supporters and earn him a second look from the few voters who remain undecided.
With the election three weeks away, Mr Obama's second of three debates with Mitt Romney represented one of the final chances to make an impression with voters.
The President made the most of it with a focused, aggressive effort. It was a sharp departure from his listless first debate two weeks ago, when Romney's dominant performance ignited a resurgence by the Republican that left the race virtually even heading into Tuesday's match-up.
"Game on – he's back," Carleton College political science professor Steven Schier said of the President.
Mr Obama made sure to work in all of the attack lines he had neglected in the first debate.
The President also outlined the accomplishments of his first term – from saving the car industry to killing Osama bin Laden – and framed his answer to a question on women's rights in movingly personal terms.
Mr Romney had his moments, especially when describing promises Mr Obama had made and not kept. The Republican avoided the type of rout Mr Obama suffered in the first debate, but the night belonged to the President, analysts said.
Flash polls after the debate pointed to an Obama win. Meanwhile, his odds for re-election on the In-trade prediction market, which allows people to buy or sell shares in real-life events, climbed 1.6% points, to 63.6%.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article