An Israeli court has cleared the country's military of any blame for the death of American activist Rachel Corrie, who was crushed by an Army bulldozer during a pro-Palestinian protest in Gaza.
Ms Corrie's family had accused Israel of intentionally and unlawfully killing their 23-year-old daughter in March 2003. They launched a civil case in the city of Haifa after a military inquiry cleared the army of blame.
But Judge Oded Gershon said the death was a regrettable accident and invoked a clause that absolved the army because the incident had taken place during a wartime situation.
"She did not distance herself from the area, as any thinking person would have done," Judge Gershon told a packed court.
Ms Corrie, from Olympia, Washington, had joined a small group of international activists trying to stop the Israeli army from demolishing houses in the southern Gaza town of Rafah during the height of a Palestinian intifada, or uprising.
Her friends said she was wearing a bright orange vest at the time of the incident and was standing on a mound of earth, but had lost her footing as the bulldozer advanced. The driver said he had not seen her nor heard the cries to stop.
Ms Corrie's mother, Cindy, denounced the verdict and accused the court of looking to shield the military from justice.
"I believe this was a bad day not only for our family but for human rights, for humanity, the rule of law and also for the country of Israel," she said. The family said it would appeal the ruling.
Corrie's death made her a symbol of the uprising, and while her family battled through the courts to establish who was responsible for her death, her story was dramatised on stage in a dozen countries and told in the book, Let Me Stand Alone.
Judge Gershon said soldiers had done their utmost to keep people away from the site on the day of the demonstration, adding that visibility had been poor and Ms Corrie had not been careful about where she had stood.
The Israeli army said it needed to demolish houses to prevent guerrillas from using the area as cover for attacks. Palestinians called it a form of collective punishment. The United Nations condemned the practice.
"It was a very regrettable accident and not an intentional act," the judge said, dismissing the family's claims for damages. He ruled that the family would have to pay its own legal costs but not those of the defence.
Senior US officials criticised the original military investigation into the case, saying it had been neither thorough nor credible. But the judge said the inquiry had been appropriate and pinned no blame on the army.
Ms Corrie's mother, who struggled to hold back her tears, said she felt let down not just by the Israeli legal system but also by US diplomacy.
"Rachel was a human being and we as her family deserved accountability," Cindy Corrie said. "The [Israeli] state has worked extremely hard so that the truth behind what happened to my daughter is not exposed."
Few Israelis showed much sympathy for Ms Corrie's death, which occurred during the second Palestinian intifada in which thousands of Palestinians were killed and hundreds of Israelis died in suicide bombings.
Israel's far-right Yisrael Beitenu party, a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition, said the verdict was a vindication after vilification.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article