LIBERIAN President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf has called a US decision to deploy 3,000 troops to West Africa a "significant moment" in the battle against the worst Ebola outbreak on record and she said she hoped it would spur other nations into action.
Ms Johnson Sirleaf said her government was "fighting back" against the deadly virus. Ebola has killed around 1,300 people in Liberia, the country hardest hit by the outbreak.
She said: "Our American partners realise Liberia cannot defeat Ebola alone. This disease is not simply a Liberian or West African problem. The entire community of nations has a stake in ending this crisis.
"We hope this decision by the US will spur the rest of the international community into action."
US President Barack Obama said the outbreak was a looming threat to international security and announced a major expansion of the US role in trying to halt the spread of the disease, including the deployment of 3,000 troops.
The US plan also includes establishing a regional command and control centre in Liberia's capital; building 17 treatment centres with 100 beds each and training thousands of health workers.
Ms Johnson Sirleaf, a winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for her work on women's rights, added: "The people of Liberia have suffered greatly since this disease took hold. But we are a strong and resilient people.
"To Liberians, my message is simple - we are fighting back."
The worst Ebola outbreak since the disease was identified in 1976 has already killed nearly 2,500 people, half of the number infected. It is threatening to spread elsewhere in Africa.
The outbreak of the highly contagious virus, which causes fever and uncontrolled bleeding, was first confirmed in the remote forests of southeastern Guinea in March, then spread across Sierra Leone and Liberia.
A handful of Ebola deaths have been recorded in Nigeria, Africa's most populous country, and several health workers have been infected.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article