RUSSIA is refusing to discuss plans for political transformation in Syria should President Bashar al Assad be removed from power.
In the face of western nations calling on Russia to abandon support for Assad, the Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, yesterday emphasised Moscow's strong opposition to external interference.
The decision came as violence surges in Syria, despite a UN ceasefire negotiated in April.
Western powers have held intensive diplomatic discussions with Moscow in recent weeks as the UN Security Council member blocks efforts to have Mr Assad removed by diplomatic means after 15 months of bloodshed.
At a news conference following talks with his Iraqi counterpart, Mr Lavrov said he had seen reports that US State Department spokeswoman, Victoria Nuland, had suggested Washington and Moscow were discussing a post-Assad strategy for Syria.
"If that was really said then it's not true," Mr Lavrov said. "Such discussions are not being held and cannot be held, because to decide for the Syrian people contradicts our position completely.
"We do not get involved in overthrowing regimes – neither through approval of unilateral actions by the UN Security Council nor by participation in any political plots."
Ms Nuland had been asked at a news conference on Thursday whether the US and Russia were discussing a transition of power similar to that seen in Yemen last year, in which President Ali Abdullah Saleh was replaced. "We are continuing to talk about a post-Assad transition strategy in that context," she had said.
Mr Lavrov said any broad international talks must include Iran and must only address ways to create conditions for dialogue in Syria – not its content nor preconditions such as Mr Assad's exit.
Russia, which has come under increasing criticism for arms deals with Syria, responded to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's claim that attack helicopters were being delivered.
Mr Lavrov denies making new deliveries of military helicopters to the Middle Eastern state but under old contracts said Russia had repaired craft sent to Syria "many years ago".
"There are no new deliveries of Russian military helicopters to Syria. All arms industry cooperation with Syria is limited to a transfer of defensive arms," the ministry said on its website.
"As regards helicopters, planned repairs of [helicopters] delivered to Syria many years ago were conducted earlier," it said.
A source close to Russia's arms exporting monopoly, Rosoboronexport, said at least nine Mi-25 helicopters were sent to Russia's Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad to be repaired by Oboronservis, owned by the defence ministry.
At least two ships carrying Russian weapons have reportedly travelled to Syria this year, though possibly not on behalf of Rosoboronexport.
Meanwhile, the European Union yesterday banned exports to Syria of luxury goods such as shoes, caviar and boats, as well as items with possible military application.
The move aims to keep up pressure on the family of the Syrian president, in particular his wife Asma al Assad, who is said to have continued shopping for luxury products during the conflict.
And in a bid to encourage a "stronger revolt" against Assad's government, France is considering providing communications equipment to Syrian rebels, its foreign minister said.
Laurent Fabius said France fully supported Arab League-UN special envoy Kofi Annan's peace plan but that it was also looking at "other options."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article