A BOMB blast just beside Egypt's foreign ministry killed three policemen yesterday, authorities said, in the most serious attack in Cairo in almost three months.
There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the bombing, which killed two police lieutenant colonels and a recruit, according to the foreign ministry.
But the operation resembled ones carried out by Islamist insurgents seeking to topple the US-backed government, underlining security challenges facing President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, who has just completed 100 days in office.
Sisi has pushed through some badly needed economic reforms such as a rise in fuel prices. But tackling Islamist militants - an issue that has dogged one Egyptian leader after another - is far from easy. Egypt has faced rising Islamist militant violence since Sisi deposed President Mohamed Mursi last year after mass protests against his rule and cracked down on his Muslim Brotherhood movement.
The challenge has become more complex since Islamic State (IS) militants seized parts of Iraq and Syria in June and declared a caliphate, inspiring other militant groups including some based along Egypt's border with chaotic Libya.
IS established ties with Sinai-based Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis and has been coaching Egypt's most lethal militant organisation, security officials and an Ansar commander told Reuters.
Smoke rose and people ran after Sunday's blast along a pavement in the neighbourhood of Boulaq bu Eila, just behind the foreign ministry, which is located in a high rise building beside the Nile.
The last significant attack in Cairo was on June 30, when two policemen died trying to defuse bombs planted by militants near the presidential palace.
Sunday's blast caused a tree to fall on a car. Blood stained a busy intersection beside a crowded market.
While the death toll was low, any attack in Cairo is bound to cast doubt over the effectiveness of security forces, who have vowed to end militant bloodshed that has hammered tourism, a pillar of the economy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article