BARACK Obama flew into a fresh controversy yesterday after returning from a surprise visit to US troops in Afghanistan.
Hours after informing personnel to loud cheers at Bagram Airbase that "America's war in Afghanistan will come to a responsible end" with the withdrawal of US troops, the president was embroiled in a row over the accidental release of the name of a key security official in an email.
He led the remembering its war heroes, the fallen and those still defending the flag, in a Memorial Day tribute at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia. He also carried out the presidential tradition of laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, where he was joined by first lady Michelle, vice president Joe Biden and Mr Biden's wife, Jill.
However, President Obama's administration faced severe criticism after it let out the name of the CIA's top official in Afghanistan in an email circulated to thousands of journalists during the trip to Bagram. The name of the officer - identified as "chief of station" in Kabul - was included by US embassy staff on a list of 15 senior US officials who spoke to the president during his visit.
The list was sent to a reporter who was representing the news media, who then sent it out to the White House press pool list, which contains up to 6,000 recipients.
The officer's name is being withheld at the request of the Obama administration, who said its publication could put his life and those of his family members in danger. But it was widely available on the internet.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article