TALKS aimed at ending the war in Syria have taken a tentative step forward after both sides agreed to use the same document as the basis of discussions, although they disagreed about how the negotiations should proceed.
Both sides said they had agreed to use the Geneva communique, a document agreed at a previous international conference in Geneva in June 2012, and which sets out the stages needed for an end to the fighting and a political transition.
Opposition spokesman Louay al Safi said: "We have agreed Geneva 1 is the basis of the talks."
Bouthaina Shaaban, a Syrian presidential adviser, said there was agreement on using the text, but with some reservations.
The opposition wants to start by addressing the question of the transitional governing body the talks aim to create, but the government says the first step is to discuss "terrorism".
The government describes those fighting to overthrow President Bashar al Assad as terrorists. The opposition says transitional arrangements must include the removal of Mr Assad which the government rejects.
Despite the differing interpretations of Geneva 1, organisers of the talks at the UN in Geneva have been at pains to keep the process going and dissuade either of the sides from walking out.
Syrian state television said the government wanted to discuss the text of Geneva 1 "paragraph by paragraph".
Mr Shaaban added: "Mr Brahimi said tomorrow they are going to discuss terrorism because stopping terrorism is the first issue that should be handled.
"Even in Geneva 1 the first item is to stop violence which has turned to terrorism."
International mediator Lakhdar Brahimi, who is chairing the talks, said earlier both sides were talking to the media too much and should respect the confidentiality of the talks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article