Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has said third parties including Iraq were conveying information to Damascus about the US-led campaign of air strikes against the Islamic State (IS) militant group in Syria.
In an interview with the BBC, Mr Assad said there was no direct cooperation with the US, whose air force has been bombing IS in Syria since September as part of a strategy aimed at rolling back the group.
IS has seized wide areas of Syria and Iraq, declaring them part of a cross-border "caliphate". But the US has said Mr Assad cannot be a partner in the campaign against the group, describing him as part of the problem.
The Syrian government is waging its own, separate campaign against IS, including air strikes in areas that have also been struck by the US-led alliance. It has been widely assumed the Syrian and US forces have conveyed information about the movements of jets using the same air space.
Asked if there was indirect cooperation, Mr Assad said: "That's true, through third parties, more than one party, Iraq and other countries, sometimes they convey a message, a general message, but there is nothing tactical."
Mr Assad said the Syrian government had known about the US-led campaign before it started but did not have details. The US said in September it had informed the Syrian ambassador to the UN before the first strikes.
Asked if there was ongoing dialogue via third parties, Mr Assad said: "There is no dialogue. There is, let's say, information, but not dialogue."
Iraqi officials say they have also passed information to the Shi'ite Islamist government in Iran about the US-led campaign against Islamic State. Iran is an important ally of Mr Assad.
The United States took a strong position against Assad after the uprising against his rule erupted in 2011, saying he should leave power, and has funneled support including limited amounts of military aid to some armed opposition groups.
U.S. officials say they have not relented in their goal of Assad leaving power but, as has been the case for months, they see no policy likely to achieve this at an acceptable cost, and their priority has switched to fighting Islamic State.
As a result, for months they have tacitly lived with Assad staying in power and made no bones that their focus is to combat the group rather than push Syria's president from power.
SYRIA NO FAILED STATE
The Syrian government has sought to consolidate control over the main urban centres in the western portion of the country, including Damascus. Islamic State has meanwhile seized control of much of the east and north.
The Shi'ite-led government in Iraq, together with Iran and the Lebanese group Hezbollah, have been important allies for Assad in the conflict. Shi'ite Iraqi militias have fought on Assad's side against the insurgency spearheaded by Sunni Islamists.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a British-based monitoring group, said on Saturday the death toll from nearly four years of civil war in Syria had risen to 210,000 people.
Assad said Syria was not a failed state, saying the government and state institutions were still "fulfilling their duty toward the Syrian people".
He also denied the army had used barrel bombs in its campaign against the insurgency. The use of barrel bombs - barrels packed with explosives and projectiles that are dropped from helicopters - has been criticised by Syria's opponents and human rights groups.
"They're called bombs. We have bombs, missiles and bullets ... There is no barrel bombs, we don't have barrels," he said. (Writing by Tom Perry; Editing by Angus MacSwan)
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article