The girlfriend of the Las Vegas gunman said she had no inkling of the massacre he was plotting when he sent her on a trip abroad to see her family.
Marilou Danley issued the statement after returning from her native Philippines and being questioned for much of the day by FBI agents still trying to work out what drove Stephen Paddock to kill 59 people at a country music festival from his 32nd-floor hotel suite.
“He never said anything to me or took any action that I was aware of that I understood in any way to be a warning that something horrible like this was going to happen,” Ms Danley said in a statement read by her lawyer outside FBI headquarters in Los Angeles.
Marilou Danley returned to the US from the Philippines on Tuesday night (Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department via AP)
Ms Danley, who out of the country for more than two weeks, said she was initially pleased when Paddock wired her money in the Philippines to buy a house for her family, but she later feared it was a way to break up with her.
“It never occurred to me in any way whatsoever that he was planning violence against anyone,” she said.
Ms Danley, 62, who has been called a “person of interest” by investigators, said she knew Paddock as a “kind, caring, quiet man” and hoped they would have a future together.
Investigators are struggling to determine a motive (Marcio Jose Sanchez/AP)
She said she was devastated by the carnage and she would co-operate with authorities as they struggle to get inside Paddock’s mind.
Investigators are busy reconstructing his life, behaviour and the people he encountered in the weeks leading up to the deadliest mass shooting in modern US history, FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe said. That includes examining his computer and mobile phone.
But as of Wednesday, investigators were unable to come up with a motive for the Sunday night attack that left more than 500 people injured and ended with Paddock killing himself in his room at the Mandalay Bay hotel casino.
police officer stands by a blocked off area near the Mandalay Bay casino">A Las Vegas police officer stands by a blocked off area near the Mandalay Bay casino (John Locher/AP)
“This individual and this attack didn’t leave the sort of immediately accessible thumbprints that you find on some mass casualty attacks,” Mr McCabe said.
The 64-year-old high-stakes gambler and property investor specifically requested an upper-floor room with a view of the music festival, according to a person who has seen hotel records turned over to investigators.
The room, which goes for 590 US dollars (£445), was given to Paddock free because he was a good customer who wagered tens of thousands of dollars each time he visited the casino, the person said.
An investigator works in a room at the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino (Gregory Bull/AP)
It was just another indication of how methodically he planned the attack. Authorities have said he brought 23 weapons in 10 suitcases into the room and set up cameras inside and out to watch for police closing in on him.
But investigators had little to work with in trying to determine what set him off.
“He was a private guy. That’s why you can’t find out anything about him,” his brother, Eric Paddock, said from his home in Florida. As for what triggered the massacre, the brother said: “Something happened that drove him into the pit of hell.”
Another example of unity exhibited across the Las Vegas community @CCOutdoorNA #VegasStrong pic.twitter.com/dJq7klEM1u
— FBI Las Vegas (@FBILasVegas) October 3, 2017
Paddock had no known criminal history. Public records contained no indication of any financial problems, and his brother described him as a wealthy property investor.
“I believe, based on what I have been told, the issue was not that he was under financial stress,” said Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri, on the Homeland Security Committee.
Paddock had stockpiled 47 guns since 1982 and bought 33 of them, mostly rifles, over the past year alone, right up until three days before the attack, Jill Snyder, an agent with the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, told CBS on Wednesday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel