Snapchat lost around 1.3 billion dollars (£930m) in market value after reality star Kylie Jenner tweeted that she was no longer using the social app.
The half-sister of Kim Kardashian told her more than 24 million Twitter followers: “sooo does anyone else not open Snapchat anyone? Or is it just me… ugh this is so sad.”
Shares in Snap – the app’s parent company – closed 6% down on the US stock market after Jenner’s post, which was in reference to a controversial recent redesign of the photo sharing app.
More that one million people signed a Change.Org petition calling for Snapchat to revert to its previous design, labelling the new version too difficult to use shortly after its launch.
Jenner later tweeted again in defence of the platform.
“still love you tho snap … my first love,” she wrote.
The app’s redesign was first announced in November, with founder and chief executive Evan Spiegel calling the change a way of separating the “social” and “media” content areas of the app to allow users to keep friends and family separate from news and public content.
But in response to the online petition, the company said it would make further changes to improve the experience.
“We hear you, and appreciate that you took the time to let us know how you feel. We completely understand the new Snapchat has felt uncomfortable for many,” the firm wrote in a post on Change.org.
“Beginning soon on iOS, and with Android in the coming weeks, we are introducing tabs in Friends and Discover, which will make it easier to find the Stories that you want, when you want them.
“This new foundation is just the beginning, and we will always listen closely to find new ways to make the service better for everyone. We are grateful for your enthusiasm and creativity. We are very excited for what’s ahead.”
Snapchat is facing intense pressure from Facebook and the line of apps in its ownership – including WhatsApp and Instagram – which have adopted Snapchat-like features in recent years to try and entice users to switch services.
At around 180 million people, Snapchat also currently has significantly fewer daily users than Instagram, which currently has more than 500 million.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here