Italian populists have vowed to convert voter anger over their thwarted bid to govern for the first time into a “de facto referendum” on the European Union, financial markets and eurozone membership.
The political turmoil could see the country propelled to fresh elections as soon as late summer.
Carlo Cottarelli, an economist with International Monetary Fund experience, was asked by the Italian president to assemble a technocrat government to take the country to elections.
With weeks of political uncertainty taking a toll on Italy’s bond and stock markets, Premier-designate Mr Cottarelli said the return to the polls could come as early as after the August holiday or, at the latest, at the start of 2019.
Only five days ago, another premier-designate, political novice Giuseppe Conte, stood in the same spot in the Quirinal presidential palace and declared he would he would work to create a “government of change” in what would have been Italy’s — and western Europe’s — first populist government.
That dream deflated dramatically on Sunday night when President Sergio Mattarella refused to submit to populist demands that he approve their proposed economy minister, who in the past has recommended having a “Plan B” to exit the eurozone if EU strictures become too tight for Italy.
“This isn’t democracy, this isn’t respect for the popular vote,” railed Matteo Salvini, a firebrand populist whose right-wing League was one of the anti-EU parties foiled by Mr Mattarella.
“It’s just the last gasp of the strong powers who want Italy as a frightened, precarious slave.
“The next elections will be a plebiscite: the people and real life versus the old castes and the ‘Lords of the Spread’,” he added, referring to financial speculators.
Milan-based economist Nicola Nobile said it appeared the upcoming election could shape up as a “de facto referendum on Italian membership in the eurozone.”
Sharing Mr Salvini’s anger was 5-Star Movement leader Luigi Di Maio, the populist who had hoped to govern with him.
Mr Di Maio repeatedly called for Mr Mattarella’s impeachment for vetoing their pick for economy minister.
He also urged those angry like him to rally in Rome on Saturday.
The gathering, likely to double as a campaign rally, coincides with a national holiday celebrating the Republic and features a military parade and VIP reviewing stands in the heart of the capital.
Opposition Democrats contended the populists, by calling the rally, wanted to stage the equivalent of the 1922 March on Rome that paved the way for Benito Mussolini’s ascension to power and his Fascist regime.
“The campaign that’s being prepared will be frightening,” wrote La Stampa political commentator Marcello Sorgi.
The commentator predicted the impeachment threat against the president “who only was defending his institutional role and the Constitution is only a taste of what will come”.
When Italians voted on March 4, the result was a Parliament with no clear-cut majority. As weeks passed without a government, Mr Mattarella warned he would reluctantly appoint a nonpolitical Cabinet to take the country to fresh elections if a viable coalition could not be forged.
Mr Cottarelli pledged his government would uphold Italy’s “essential” role in both the EU and in the eurozone and he promised “prudent management of our public accounts”.
But markets have remained on edge, with the prospect of anti-euro political sentiment suddenly gaining traction in Italy and Cottarelli’s own tenure seen as limited, with another election approaching.
The government’s benchmark borrowing rate increased further, the Milan stock market slipped and the euro weakened against the dollar.
Mr Cottarelli, who earned the nickname “Mr Scissors” with his reputation for finding fat to trim in public spending, said elections could come as soon as “after August” if his Cabinet fails to get the required confidence votes in both chambers of Parliament.
The numbers are not on his side. Immediately giving him a thumbs-down were the 5-Stars and the League, whose lawmakers together have the votes to sink his government.
Also vowing to vote against Mr Cottarelli were two of Mr Salvini’s campaign alliance partners: Forza Italia, the center-right party of former Premier Silvio Berlusconi, and a smaller far-right party.
Instead, the populists were already looking to a new attempt to gain power.
Political analyst Massimo Franco said Mr Salvini’s attempt to force Mr Mattarella’s hand over the ministry appointment appeared to be a “provocation” aimed not at forming a populist government but to “possibly make it fail before it started.”
That way, Mr Salvini, whose League has made stunning gains in recent regional elections, could try for a stronger mandate to govern after new elections.
For his northern base, which traditionally is suspicious of the centralized powers in Rome, Mr Salvini, whom Corriere della Sera described as the “undisputed master of public indignation”, is likely seen as a hero for refusing to back down from Mattarella.
Mr Di Maio has decreed 5-Star lawmakers can serve more than two terms to avoid becoming part of the political “caste.”
If he applies that to himself, he would be ineligible to run.
But he already broke a big promise to his web-based constituency when he agreed to forge a coalition with Mr Salvini’s League.
He ran for premier in March with the pledge the Movement would never enter a coalition government.
Waiting in the wings is a more hard-line Movement leader, Alessandro Di Battista, who sat out the March election.
That means he is ripe for a run for office and is considered less likely to compromise with those outside the populist fold.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here