The pre-Budget discussion must have seized on the prospect with glee.
Making people who live in stately homes and grand townhouses pay VAT on their conservatories and swimming pools would demonstrate that the Cabinet millionaires were not favouring their rich friends despite the reduction in the 50p tax rate.
At first glance it would seem to be righting a glaring anomaly: why should owners of listed buildings be exempt from VAT on such examples of conspicuous consumption when it is levied on humbler folk adding an extra bedroom?
Like that other now infamous attempt to straighten out a VAT anomaly, the pasty tax, the matter of VAT on alterations to listed buildings turned out to be fiendishly complicated; so much so that anyone examining the effect of removing VAT would have quickly concluded it would cause more problems than it solved. Most obviously, in every part of Britain there is such a rich built heritage that people of all social classes live in buildings that are listed as being of architectural or historical interest. According to the Federation of Master Builders, half the people who live in listed buildings are in the four lowest socioeconomic groups and their members are seeing projects cancelled or put on hold because of the additional cost of VAT.
Despite all the headlines about eating humble pie, the Chancellor has clearly failed to learn from the fall-out over the toxic taxes he imposed in the Budget. A fast U-turn over VAT on heated pasties solved the problem because it was an acknowledgement that the policy was going to be unworkable. Removing the cap on rich philanthropists' tax-free donations to charity was a recognition (albeit belated) that it was focused on the wrong target. The problem was not the size of the gifts but their payment into private trusts rather than transparent charities.
In announcing a £30 million fund to compensate churches and other places of worship for the introduction of VAT on improvements and alterations to listed buildings, the Chancellor has failed to recognise the full extent of the anomaly he has created. A great variety of listed buildings, including many historic town halls, 19th-century mills and older town and village houses throughout Scotland are now community centres, libraries and museums, which need to alter or extend the buildings for their new purpose.
It is vital that listed buildings are kept in good repair, yet repair and maintenance costs, which tend to be higher on older buildings, are subject to VAT. As the Scottish Culture Secretary Fiona Hyslop argues in her letter to George Osborne, there is also a need for a reduction in VAT on these essential outgoings. Having acknowledged his misjudgment by exempting churches from the levy on alterations, Mr Osborne should do the same for repairs to all listed buildings, not only to maintain the built heritage but as part of a wider policy to boost much-needed construction jobs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article