I'M so slow.
I'm like one of Tolkien's Ents, some of whom slowed down so much they turned into trees.
I can't see me branching into that, though I confess that increasingly I feel like a leaf upon the wind.
I was last to buy a car. Last to own a house. Last to settle down. Last to have a flush-toilet. Now, at the age of 55, I'm last to discover Marmite.
There's a small porkie in that last sentence. I'm sure I tried Marmite in the past and found it peculiar. I don't know what caused me to revisit it. I've changed my diet, eating less meat, apart from one night a week when I splurge out on Chinese ribs accompanied by Dundee salad (chips). Maybe I was looking for vitamin B12, with which Marmite is replete.
Funnily enough, you'd think it was made of meat. It's brown and Bovril-like, and curiously addictive. Maybe that's because it's right salty. It's made from yeast extract, a by-product of brewing bevvy. Marmite paste was invented in the late 19th century by a German scientist called Justus von Liebig, and I'm not making that up.
Famously, citizens either love Marmite or hate it, which the manufacturing company acknowledged by making that the basis of a slogan. They also made a special edition called Ma'amite, to celebrate Brenda's diamond jubilee. The company is based in Englandshire, so what d'you expect?
You might expect research to shown Marmite could help defeat the MRSA superbug. And you wouldn't be disappointed. You might also expect to see it dubbed a "superfood" of value to pregnant mothers, the elderly rejuvenating their sense of taste, and vegetarianists after B12.
Other countries have their versions. Australiashire has Vegemite, Switzerland Cenovis, and the USA Vegex. But, in Britland, Marmite is the mother of all spreads.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article