GLASGOW'S statues rarely get peace these days.
For decades, they sat on their plinths observing the world go by, bothering naebody and being bothered by nane in return.
Now, fearfully, they watch for those who would bid them do what they hate most: move. Move? It ain't in a statue's job description.
First they came – or at least have plans to come – for the doughty dozen that offer their heads to the pigeons of George Square.
That curiously mixed bunch, which includes Robert Burns, Prince Albert and Sir Robert Peel, faces relocation while the square is regenerated, a laudable concept used to cover the threat of more outdoor cafeterias.
That said, it was a blessing some smart soul moved the statues of Springburn Public Halls before they were blootered to smithereens over the festive season on safety grounds. Unsurprisingly, the halls have been removed from the Buildings at Risk register. Fears have been expressed for the fate of two statues that stood in alcoves above the B (for blootered?)-listed building's former entrance. The James Sheriff sculptures are Greek-style goddess figures representing "Locomotive Manufacturing" and "Engineering". One is holding an engine to her robes, as if given a train set for Christmas.
The pair are being held captive by Glasgow City Council, and pundits fear they could meet the same fate as old classical statues of Townhead Public Library, now redeployed, according to sculpture historian Gary Nisbet, as "expensive gnomes in an Illinois garden". Put on public sale, they were snapped up Stateside. Mr Nisbet has called for the Springburn statues to be put on display for the people of Glasgow, a laudable aim this column supports.
It doesn't sound beyond the wit of municipal man. But, thereafter, enough with the moving already.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article