I AM not surprised at what I see emerging from the recent round of local authority budget proposals across Scotland and particularly in social care ("City residents face hike as spending slashed", The Herald, January 16).
Where cuts are concerned, it really is time to start calling the knife a chainsaw.
Where now are the wonderful initiatives emerging from, for example, the pipeline of the Change Fund – a main tool in the big business of the Reshaping Care for Older People agenda?
Here, new ways were to emerge to demonstrate a redesigning of new and better care services at less cost: every £1 spent would bring about a saving of £3. These initiatives would then be translated into mainstream service provision where the people would be receiving more and more care at home rather than in hospital.
Don't forget all the other underpinning activities in terms of the integration of social care and health services – with some lip service to housing – where the funding for care needs would come from one large single pot capable of being tracked to show how, where and when money was being spent. This is not to forget all the bureaucracy surrounding the principle of partnership working between all involved community interests.
This is a very complex matter which grows more complicated daily and I and others might begin to understand things better if we were shown tangible evidence of where, when £1 is cut from the care budget, this manifests itself in better outcomes for the greater good of all. After all, another objective of the Government's Single Outcome Agreement with councils was to provide outcome-focused services and move away from those service-led. Another strange development, at least with the Glasgow situation, is the hit at the voluntary sector agencies which provide care services. It is all very odd, when these bodies generally deliver at a cheaper cost than councils with their democratic overheads and recent aims to pay staff the living wage – unlikely to be achievable in other sectors.
A bit of honesty all round is needed before we propel ourselves into the situation we seem to be ever talking about trying to prevent – the demographic explosion of the elderly and others and underfunded care needs.
Val Robson,
11 Dhalling Park, Dunoon,
Glasgow's budgetary cuts should have been headed up with the parking of the proposed £15m makeover of George Square, which could be re-examined when the current austerity madness is relinquished at the 2015 General Election, or earlier if the rotten Coalition implodes. Even then, I am sure that the council's land services department could beautify the square at a fraction of the suggested cost.
The 100% increase in the charge for breakfast clubs is particularly disingenuous, (unless closure was the intention). A mother sending two children to school will face a weekly charge of £10, against the background of a raft of welfare cuts to be implemented in the current year.
However, it is the council tax freeze, allied to the 0.5 % bank rate, that is keeping hundred of thousands of us afloat.
Jimmy Johnston,
38 Merryland Street,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article